WordPress vs HTML statique – Qu’est-ce qui convient le mieux à votre site d’entreprise ?

57 commentairesLaisser une réponse

1. Syed Balkhi

   Hey WPBeginner readers,
   Did you know you can win exciting prizes by commenting on WPBeginner?
   Every month, our top blog commenters will win HUGE rewards, including premium WordPress plugin licenses and cash prizes.
   You can get more details about the contest from here.
   Start sharing your thoughts below to stand a chance to win!

2. Jagdeesh

   Hey All,

   Just would like say one thing about Words Press and Website Developer
   Both are easy to use when compare to past 10 years coding knowledge.

   Thanks

   Répondre

   • WPBeginner Support

     Thanks for sharing your opinion

     Répondre

     Administrateur

3. karthik

   was sure a helpful information. Thank you

   Répondre

   • WPBeginner Support

     Glad our article could be helpful

     Répondre

     Administrateur

4. David E. Roy, Ph.D.

   Hi, years ago, at the dawn of Internet time, I created my own websites w/ Dreamweaver. I got used to easily creating a page as well as linking various pages together. With WordPress, so far, I can’t seem to get the logic sufficiently to do easily what I want to do. I want to be able to have a home page that lists topics I am writing about and where I can archive them in separate topics; perhaps have titles of past comments pop up with a mouse over, etc.

   I know also there are a number of terms and names of processes to be learned, but what I keep feeling is that I don’t know what I’m going nor how it is going to look or function. In the long run, if I do earn some $ from what I am doing, I probably will want to hire someone to post, maintain, etc. But until or unless that day arrives, I need to do this myself.

   So, I’m open to suggestions!

   Répondre

5. Mauro

   Hello everybody,

   I have a WP site (impreza theme) and I’d like to upload some elearning courses whose content starts wiith home.htm.

   The user experience would be very simple: when they reach courses page (regular WP page) they can choose form a grid of courses that basically are thumbnail impages with proper links to sitename.it/wp-contents/upload/2017/06/home.htm.

   Where I should put the home.htm and following contents? I have another site with AVADA and I put them under wp-contents/upload/2017…etc. and it works! But with Impreza I get a page error.

   Do you have any suggestion?

   Thanks a lot,
   Mauro

   Répondre

6. Justin

   Im a pro developer and its true, when you need a new section people need to hire me but i never need to recommend WP it can be easily done in code.
   Also you can have a CMS in html.
   Most importantly people pay me 80k-100k a year because html website rank better on google because they load faster then Wordpress and the code to make wordpress work ranks you lower as well.

   Répondre

7. Rojar

   I really can not understand what is the best between 2 , if i tell you to chose what you will take?
   Thank you!

   Répondre

   • WPBeginner Support

     Hi Rojar,

     We will choose WordPress.

     Répondre

     Administrateur

8. Johnny

   Wow what a a hot topic as I was stuck between the 2. HTML or CMS WP. I think. I’ll stick to Dreamweaver meanwhile.

   Répondre

9. sergio

   who said HTML is only static guys?with the HTML 5, it can be also dynamic or add node.js it will go real-time live lolll when you change your code in HTML it will be right away displaying on the server.

   Répondre

10. Michael

    HTML / CSS and everything that comes with creating a fully functional responsive website costs too much time. It becomes too expensive for the customers and is time consuming.
     
    With WordPress, you can set up a complete website within 1 day. HTML is fun but takes too much time so you miss other projects.

    Répondre

11. David

    HTML/CSS and all that goes into it to make a fully functional responsive website just takes too much time. It’s not practical anymore. With Wordpress you could set up a professional website in one day and you move one to another. It’s noble/fun to do HTML/CSS/JQuery/Bootstrap etc, but it’s soooo time consuming that it’s just not worth it.

    Répondre

12. R Daniel

    Why did I expect anything but a long-winded advertisement for WordPress?

    Répondre

    • Jonathan

      I was thinking the same thing. Talk about biased.

      Répondre

13. Suanlian Tangpua

    Static HTML5 website loads very fast and really good for SEO when compared to WordPress. But, like you’ve said it needs the knowledge to update a page.

    Répondre

14. Dean

    I find there is a problem that most newbies and some professed users of Wordpress don’t speak much about. When comparing WP with HTML you need to bring up the need to update constantly with Wordpress where as HTML if coded correctly lasts far longer without any updates making it superior to WP as a content management system.
    Security is the biggest issue of all with Wordpress. Most people get breached because of sloppy website management. While it is understood that HTML websites can sing the same song yet Wordpress is to easy to publish with out the right precautions set.

    Répondre

15. Peter H

    Static html is not obsolete. So many professionals in here bot nobody mentioned that you can have best of both worlds. You can easily combine static pages and use wordpress for just on blog pages or just where you need to manage the content. People tend to push wordpress everywhere. Think twice and use right tool …

    Répondre

16. Mustafa Faris

    I have WordPress sites and i am very happy with them but sometimes i missed my old simple, fast and white HTML pages …. these days we need something like WordPress to make it faster to update and add.

    Répondre

17. Deborah Jane

    Which is better for SEO on a small E commerce site?

    Répondre

18. Rajiv

    Awesome article! WP indeed gives you en easier interface to update your site and it’s time saving too for non-tech friendly people specially. However the worst thing about WE is that almost all websites look similar. For someone like me who wants innovation and things done as per my own requirements, HTML is the buddy.

    Répondre

19. Daniel

    I’m a certified web developer/graphic artist that has been doing this for a while. I consider it all a matter of personal preference. I personally love to type out and build an entire responsive site in html/css, or buy a nice template and alter it. I know that’d make some people put an ice pick in their ear, but for me, I enjoy the minute details that you can do with html/css that you can not do with wordpress. C’mon… with css/html you can have a website that looks exactly like a wordpress site, you can go into the code and edit things anywhere on your site down to moving 1 specific pixel for goodness sake…. wordpress does not give you that level of control. Then you just attach your clients website to a WYSIWYG editor, and they can then log in and make any text changes that they want to pages, change text content, swap pictures, whatever…. and you don’t have to lift a finger, and you can define with css the areas that they can and can’t edit in their nice and easy user friendly UI.

    The amount of customization that you can do to your site when you build it yourself with html/css/javascript/whatever….. is 10x more customizable than with wordpress. Sure you can add plugins in wordpress, but you can do the same thing with coding it yourself into your site. It’s all personal preference though.

    Static html sites are in no way going away. If done properly they are much more secure than ones built with wordpress. At the end of the day though, it’s what works best for you and your client though. Some of us just like to look at text strings, others don’t

    Répondre

20. hammad

    This article is very helpful for us..

    I have a question here… that which is more secure about security ?

    Répondre

    • Ash

      That is a great question and one that most people don’t consider. Wordpress has some serious security concerns. Like any platform, if you keep it updated, it SHOULD stay ahead of the hackers. However, most beginners and casual users will not keep Wordpress up to date.

      On the other hand, the static html example (leave out JavaScript) in this article would have no inherent security vulnerabilities. But like anything, in the hands of a novice, mistakes could be made which could open a door.

      If security is your concern, a professionally coded site with managed hosting or a (semi) active webmaster is the way to go. And don’t let people tell you this is too expensive. It can be the most affordable option when you count the time of learning a platform like Wordpress or the hassle of dealing with a hacked site.

      Répondre

21. Arthur D. Clerk

    Something that doesn’t seem to be mentioned is the ability, or lack thereof, for HTML sites to easily be responsive. Given the need these days to suit a site to desktops, laptops, tablets and phones, working with a Wordpress theme gives you that power.

    One of the drawbacks these days to using Wordpress is that so many template demos look alike. There’s a lack of originality in design from theme developers. I find it refreshing to stumble upon an HTML site, and for very small sites (local salon, pizza delivery place, car repairman, etc.), the HTML sites work fine. Maybe even better. Less hassle and less subject to being hacked.

    Répondre

22. Marcos

    What about static HTML generating plugins for Wordpress?

    Where the WordPress runs on a local (your own computer) or a local server (with the client), a plugin creates the files as they are published and then it’s uploaded using FTP (together with the wp-content/uploads/ folder). It would be necessary a script to regenerate files like the home page.

    You get the update advantage of WP, the speed and better security of pure HTML.

    I’ve been thinking on this solution, I can imagine a few hickups but most can be solved. I only have 2 problems (all theoretical): different post types, created by themes and plugins (even so I believe it’s still possible) and comments (if you use them – not my case).

    Does anyone see this possibility any different?

    Thanks

    Répondre

    • Marjolein

      The idea of a CMS separated from the HTML output is not new. Moreover; a large proprietary CMS works like this. Benefit; secure & if hacked easy to recover. Downsite; more and more large websites are very interactive; more like applications then website. So working with a CMS set-up like this while maintaining code on the server-side simultaiously can be a challenge. Like you mentioned. But the basic idea works.

      Répondre

23. Aliji

    HTML will only get more widespread adoption. the insicurity of wordpress and other content management system is a problem for web developers, as hackers and the web continue to advance more businesses will rely on html rather than a CMS to manage their site. i would say, for very security consceious businesses html is still the best for you.

    Répondre

24. Ruby

    I have a business, and the person who did my website used WP. My website was hacked into, and the hacker used my website as a fake page to do ATM transactions online. I now have no website, and getting a new one done in HTML. As a client, I do not want to deal with security issues and updating the site myself, which the web developer insisted I could do, and then was nowhere to be found to help me out. I am extremely frustrated! Will a new website in HTML fix my problem? I will change my web hosting as well.

    Répondre

    • WPBeginner Support

      Depends on your needs and requirements. A plain HTML website can also get hacked.

      Répondre

      Administrateur

      • mo

        If an HTML website is hacked. Can I call my web host to delete the account, and make it fresh?
        I always keep a back up, this way I can upload everything at a moment’s notice.

        Répondre

25. Rahul

    Building a website is not very tough job, just we need to choose proper platform to work on it. Creating a website according to our business is something different as just building a website. Wordpress is easy way to any kind of website with no more coding issues. It have plugins option, user friendly features, best way to update and many more. It supports all SEO activities too. So having wordpress is any time best option for you

    Répondre

26. Gary Sjogren

    I’m just starting to learn about what’s involved with a WP site. But I’ve hand-coded html for 15 years, and more recently created some sites using Google sites. No one mentioned Google, so I wonder how that compares with WP, especially since it has a WYSIWYG editor for text, tables, and embedded graphics. Please comment!

    Répondre

27. M

    Can any domain name be mapped onto a WordPress Business account? Or is it only some domain names with certain endings ie. .com , etc?

    Répondre

    • WPBeginner Support

      The self hosted WordPress.org does not require a business account. You can use it on any domain you like. Please see our guide on the difference between self hosted WordPress.org vs free WordPress.com blog.

      Répondre

      Administrateur

28. Edward

    I like WP but I’ve just started with html and css and in my humble opinion html is for me.

    Répondre

    • Daniel

      Look forward to seeing one of your themes on the Wordpress repository

      Répondre

29. Osama

    Great post,but i think html site is more easy to manage by myself there are services like weebly or wix that you can do your website in no time and so easily no need to hire anyone.

    Répondre

    • raybees

      Wix? Weebly? cmon have you read their terms? They can terminate your site at any time for any reason with no comeback. Also they are limited in MANY ways that most business web developers understand but normal people do not. The advantages depend on what the site is being used for of course – but ownership, revisions, flexibility, high perf hosting and upkeep are just a few (probably over 100 advantages i could call off the top of my head). And the people saying pro sites are easy? show me the pro site created in a day. It will be crap – SEO tuned content, custom vector/svg graphics and photographers – Its actually a big job and why they cost so much.

      Répondre

30. Rudy

    HTML sites may not be as popular as CMS style site, however, you do have a variety of add-ons to use, like surveys, polls, photo gallery, etc….To add or modify a page is not difficult to do with HTML/CSS if YOU are the one who created the site. Even with CMS, if you use a developer, they may not always be avail when you need them.

    Fortunately, WP for Beginners provides great information and I’ve learned how to configure my websites on my own…

    Répondre

31. Susan Holland

    I’ve been working with static sites from the olden days of such things. While I am not a professional web designer, nor am I an html expert, I have found that the tools offered on DIY sites make it seem comparatively simple compared to the old necessity of STP interfaces and constant learning curves. How wonderful it is to put up a gallery by uploading images to a « gallery » and then manipulating from there, linking to anything you want from that base.

    What I love about Wordpress is the fluidity of it. It has the opportunity for a LOT of personality, and so I have used it for a blog platform for many years as well. Linking content from one platform to another is such a fine smorgasbord!

    My new venture will be with a domain I own…a portal site (html) from an easy « sitebuilder » provided by the host, and many pages with links to my blog entries on your Wonderful Wordpress.

    I have a job ahead transplanting specific blocks of data from old blogs and also old business oriented websites. There will be some complicated linking going on until I can detach the « old » and move on with the new. But I am excited about the possibilities. i would be interested to know if this seems a good plan to WPbeginner techs? Susan

    Répondre

32. Kaye Handlon

    I make a modest living building WordPress websites for small to medium size businesses. And while I love WordPress for certain types of websites, I don’t full agree with this article.

    The main point I do not agree with is the cost, and specifically the statement « f you want to have the freedom and control of your website and not waste money on monthly retainers paying developers to add images, then WordPress is obviously the better choice. ». It has been my first hand experience with over 150 clients that many of them simply do NOT feel comfortable keeping a WordPress website up to date (WordPress itself, plugins, making backups to run updates and managing security).

    Quite honestly I believe the learning curve for PROPERLY keeping WordPress updated and secure about as easy or difficult as setting up an FTP client to download / upload static html files to make simple text changes.

    So in that regard, most ‘non-techy’ business owners will still pay a developer (like me) to properly update their WordPress website and keep it, on a basic level, secure.

    Personally, my suggestion is if they plan to make weekly, or even a large amount of monthly updates (church websites are ideal candidates for WordPress website) then WordPress is worth it for the ‘non-techy’ business or organization. If they plan to make updates less than that, and the changes would be small (an update on yearly policy documents, quarterly updates for service prices, or that sort of thing) then they are better off with a static HTML website and paying a developer for 15 minutes or even an hour of time to do those updates. Chances are they would be paying a developer that much yearly for a developer to keep their WordPress site secure and properly backed up and updated.

    Don’t get me wrong, I love WordPress, I just think for smaller websites that might only receive light text updates less-than-monthly, a static html website may be the way to go as far as money spent with a developer for maintenance.

    Répondre

33. teri matelson

    Technically, html has been evolving and changing, and coders learning and moving forward. Still, I think the Admin-backend programs like WP, Weebly and such will take over. That’s fine. However… « Quite Easy » is not the case in WP and although some clients will be able to log in to make minor changes in text or upload an image, they better have contact with the developer and be prepared to pay an hourly fee when the developer needs to add/design new pages/content, fix what the client broke, fix what a WP update broke, renew a license, or help with what just didn’t come out looking quite right. WP is highly technical and complex, and design is still a skill many people don’t have. This « free and easy » type advertising of WP is ok when it’s .com, but WP websites of any quality… just not so.

    Répondre

    • Louis

      I try to stick with a static site over WordPress whenever possible. My 2 main reasons are speed and security.

      Répondre

34. JasonW

    You forgot to add that static sites are a ton more secure. With no server side language script bugs to exploit, it makes it 100x harder for hackers.

    @ADRIENNE WordPress and all other CMS’ combined is only about 60% of what makes up the internet. Static sites are still alive and well in 2016 making up the largest part of the interwebs.

    Répondre

    • Kaye

      I totally agree with you. I have clients who can barely wrap their mind around how to make simple text changes in WordPress, or ad an image to content. They simply do not want anything to do with keeping their WordPress websites moderately secure, properly backed-up (and archived) and updated.

      I think for the average non-tech related small business (or organization) owner/manager with a small website with less than monthly content changes, they are better off with a static HTML website and just paying a developer for 30 minutes – 1 hour of their time to do the updates. This type of website owner would be paying that to a developer for WordPress maintenance anyhow.

      Répondre

    • Sorto

      Yes, security and speed.

      Répondre

      • Lyn Anderson

        I like WordPress and will continue to use it but there are sites I’m thinking of making static HTML, mainly for speed.

        Répondre

35. Alan

    A good article but if I may add further consideration based upon my own experience (I am not an expert!)

    One thing that hasn’t been focussed on is security. I manage a number of Joomla and Wordpress sites.

    Whilst both suffer from hacking attempts the Wordpress sites suffers many more in comparison.

    I am not saying Joomla is better than Wordpress here (that is a totally different subject) but the facts speak for them themselves in my experience of both – Wordpress is more susceptible to hack attempts.

    Wordpress (and Joomla) require a database to store content and sensitive data like admin login details. The databases can be hacked and injected with nasty stuff that breaks your site or allows someone to steal information or let them do whatever they want with your lovingly crafted website or blog. Security plugins are available to deter this however.

    As the Editor has pointed out, with Wordpress you HAVE to keep your Wordpress version up to date as well as your theme(s) and plugins through regular updates as all use the database and they can and sometimes do suffer from vulnerabilities. Updates can also break your site which is applicable across the CMS system.

    If you are a business that depends on your website this is a matter you must consider because realistically you need someone to manage the updates (although you can have Wordpress on auto update). This may need to be a developer who can take steps to prevent upgrade mishaps.

    With a static site you have none of these issues as there is no database. You may need a developer to build your static site but on the flip side if you need a developer to regularly manage the security and updates of the software and plugins on your Wordpress, which will impact most upon your business?

    Whilst Adrienne’s view that static site’s are a thing of the past is shared by many (mine included up to a few months ago) there is a movement towards static site generators such as Hugo and Grav that are addressing the constant headache of security updates associated with the likes of Drupal, Joomla and Wordpress by generating a flat file CMS (no database).

    Wordpress is a fantastic tool for a business website but beware – do your research on how to protect your website from some not so nice people out there…

    Répondre

    • Edward Martin III

      I have been REALLY enjoying exploring Grav! It’s j-u-s-t at the limit of what I know, but the results are very nice, and I am enjoying learning about it more than I enjoyed learning about WP.

      I can’t bring myself to agree that static sites are a thing of the past. (respectfully disagree — not being mean about it)

      As you and others have mentioned: it really REALLY depends on your business needs.

      And security needs. Ugh, security needs…

      Répondre

36. kaushik

    Static HTML can also be replaced with wordpress when used with simplified themes like Genesis.

    Répondre

37. felix

    Great article

    Répondre

38. Adrienne

    In 2016, a static page is really a thing of the past. I can’t even image going back to static web pages. Keep up with WordPress, it’s the best thing out there.

    Répondre

    • Angus

      Personally I would bet that there will be an increased move towards static html sites with GUI back end editors.

      Répondre

39. Marius

    I don’t know of any web developer in 2016 that offers only static html versions of a website unless you specifically ask for it, maybe simple one-pagers aside. I’m not surprised you’re touting WP given your business, but then let’s be honest and name all the disadvantages.

    I have a developer background and I’ve been working for years with WP. Let me tell you, while WP is powerful, it is just as cost-intense as any other website once you want some individual functions for your business. And at one point you’ll want something individual to be implemented or a broken plugin to be fixed, because it doesn’t work with the latest WP update.

    Second – WP is *fat* and will deliver a much slower user experience compared to a neat, individual website. Period. And yes, while the availability of plugins is an advantage of WP, the security risks coming with them gives us devs a headache. Ask the creators of Linux Mint – and they’re not newbies. You don’t want to ruin your business because your wordpress installation secretly distributes malware.

    And just don’t think I’m a WP-basher – I love WP especially for the speed to set it up. It’s like five minutes and I’ve got a blog going. That’s awesome.

    Répondre

    • Edward Martin III

      « You don’t want to ruin your business because your wordpress installation secretly distributes malware. »

      This!

      What a lot of folks don’t realize (and what I realized when it happened to me) is that once Google figures out your site is hijacked, they de-list you.

      Once you aren’t on Google, you are literally nobody.

      I think it’s… less than fully responsible to talk up CMSs for businesses without underscoring how important security is — and how much damage can be done by lack of security. If my personal blog site gets dropped by Google for a month while I work out a security issue, no biggie, but if my business site vanishes for a month, that’s money out of my pocket starting on day 1.

      (and on shared hosting — even more dangerous)

      Répondre